Looking For Bloggers Who Cover Online Video To Moderate Conference Panels

If you are a blogger that covers the online video industry or any facet of it including infrastructure, advertising, content, etc…. I am looking for a few more moderators for the Streaming Media West show taking place in San Jose from Nov. 6-8th.

I have some sessions already planned out that you can jump on or you can write your own session topic and description that you want to organize a panel around. I am specifically looking for bloggers/writers who cover the industry and have insight into the business and technology trends taking place.

If interested, please e-mail me or call me at 917-523-4562. Note: I already have a lot of bloggers on board so only a few spots are left. Contact me ASAP if you are interested.

Sponsored by

Updated List Of Content Delivery Providers For Streaming Video Delivery

Since my post three months ago entitled "Comprehensive List Of Stream Hosting Providers" much has changed in the content delivery market. That being the case, here is an updated list of content delivery networks who support streaming media delivery. Notice I didn’t say "video delivery" but rather "streaming" since many companies can deliver video via progressive download off of web servers but don’t support streaming via media servers. I also classify a content delivery network as one that providers deliver services from more than just a few locations and has its servers located in at least the North America and European regions.

Now that being said, this list does not take into account P2P providers or networks that are more of a hybrid or the ones that classify themselves as non-traditional CDNs or are P2P based. That list can be seen here and will be updated shortly as well.

Here are the networks I track, in alphabetical order.

What’s interesting to note about these ten providers is that only Akamai and Limelight have streaming media servers deployed in the Asia Pacific Region. Many of the other providers are working to build out that capacity for the near term, but don’t have it today. CDNetworks is the one exception in that they are based in Korea, but have since entered the U.S. market with a streaming media offering serving content of out nine locations in North America. I will have a more in-depth profile of CDNetworks next week.

Level 3 Making It’s Move: Acquires European Based Servecast To Accelerate Online Video Offering

Logo_level3_3_4
Level 3 announced this afternoon that it had acquired Dublin based Servecast, a provider of live and on-demand video management and streaming services for broadband and mobile platforms. Level 3 paid approximately $45 million in cash for the company which did about $5 million in revenue for 2006. Servecast his a nice suite of content management tools for the enterprise and the media and entertainment verticals and has a good reputation in the European market.

No surprise here. As I wrote about a few months ago, Level 3 is looking to be a serious player in the content delivery market for audio and video. While some doubt whether or not a networking and carrier company can really thrive against the larger CDNs, I think they can and will. They have all the pieces to be able to provide a value service offering based on the entire ecosystem for content as opposed to just pushing bits.

When Level 3 launches with their streaming media based service in Q4 of this year, I expect they will become a serious competitor right out of the gate. There is no sign of the CDN market slowing down and with the arrival of new companies in the U.S. like CDNetworks and the P2P and next generation delivery networks gaining some traction, the fight for the content delivery market is really about to get serious.

Beet.tv has an interview with Level 3’s Lisa Guillaume from the Streaming Media East show in May.

Note: I will be profiling CDNetworks, Internap and Move Networks in the coming weeks.

Sawmill Releases Product For Analyzing Flash and Windows Media Formats

Streaming Media Reporting
Sawmill, a software package that allows for the analytics of raw log files from streaming media services, announced that hey have upgraded their product to support the Adobe Flash media and Microsoft streaming media log file formats.

I’ve long been one to complain about the lack of tools on the market for those who serve their own streaming media content. (See, "Reporting Tools Lacking For Companies That Delivery Videos Online") Ever since Lariat got acquired and EnScaler went out of business over five years ago, there hasn’t been a product on the market that has gotten any real traction. That may change with Sawmill.

StreamingMedia.com did a review of the Sawmill product last month and you can read the review by Steve Mack for more details into the products features and cost. Based on Steve’s positive review, it looks like Sawmill may have a chance at really fulfilling a huge need in the market.

The biggest hurdle for Sawmill is that not many know of the company or the product. and the company is based in the UK. You can buy the product from them directly via their website but they really need to start marketing the product here in the U.S. since 9 times out of 10, when I asked people about reporting tools, they have never heard of Sawmill. If the product works as well as Steve’s review says, I’m rooting for them.

Lack Of Online Video Data and ROI By Companies Is Hurting The Industry

Reading this months Fast Company, which has an excellent article about bottled water and how American’s spend more money on bottled water than they do on iPods or movie tickets, there were some great examples of how in other industries, companies seem to be willing to say what something costs to buy or what the ROI is or potentially could be. I see a lot of this in many other industries from many companies willing to give details, but we see it from very few companies in the online video industry.

For example one of the stories in the magazine was about a band who’s song was used in an video game by Electronic Arts. It gave exact numbers on how many games were sold and exactly how much money the band made. In another article, a woman who runs the lifestyle marketing for Toyota’s Scion brand was explaining how much money they spend on marketing their product around musicians and she was up-front when asked how that leads to financial success for Scion. She replied, “The honest answer is we don’t know. Anyone who says it can be measured is flat-our lying”.

My point is this. Why is it that so few people and companies are willing to talk about success or failure, with data and numbers in nearly all facets of the online video industry? Asking any major website what online video advertising CPMs are and you won’t get an answer. And if you do it will be such a range that it us completely useless. Ask many content delivery networks what the average price is they charge per GB and typically you won’t get an answer. Ask any of the major networks how successful their online video initiatives are and you’ll be told they are successful, but no metrics will be given to validate that. Total eyeballs or streams delivered is typically the only number you hear and large traffic does not mean something was successful or profitable. Ask what is costs to sponsor online video content and you won’t get any details when it comes to numbers. Ask many content companies what their cost is to produce a program and how much it then costs them to distribute it online and numbers won’t be discussed. And of course, revenue numbers are near impossible to get from anyone.

The real question ask is why doesn’t one of these companies just share numbers on one project, or one online video campaign or some facet of their business so they can show a real ROI? Show something, set an example and give others something to strive to want to emulate to make this industry into a truly new business.

It’s a shame. At some point, you would think some of these companies would want to stand up, give out the details, set the example and be seen as the leaders in any facet of this industry. Setting the example and being a leader would help others strive to follow your lead and push this industry forward. Without that, all this mention about “success” is just a bunch of marketing talk. Think of the publicity that any company would get if they backed up their words with data. They would become the example for others to follow, they would get tons of exposure for showing a successful venture and it would help to kick-start some real data sharing. I don’t care if these big content companies and websites are only making $1 after all is said and done, that’s a profit and others can learn from it. Everyone is too cautious with data, no one wants to stand up and take charge and in the online video advertising world in particular, no one is sharing any data on CPM pricing, sponsorships rates, viewership data etc… the only data that is shared is generic or high-level with no details.

When I ask for data for an article or blog post, it’s funny how many times, the company will say, “who else are you speaking to about this article? did they give you any data?” And when I say no, then they don’t either. Snooze. What a missed opportunity to have not followed what everyone else is doing but rather lead the pack by example.

I know, many will say I am asking the impossible or talking about something that is unrealistic. But that’s not the case. It is all about thinking outside of the box, trying to foster change and drive this industry forward faster.

OMMA Video Archive With FOX, AOL, Yahoo! and ABC Now Online

OMMA Video Show
Mediapost has now archived the sessions and presentations from the OMMA Video show in NYC. The session I moderated entitled "TV Content Comes Online: Prime Time on the Web" with FOX, AOL, Yahoo! and ABC is now available for viewing.

I asked the panelists some of the questions that readers of my blog wanted to know more about so check out the Q&A portion of the video about 15 minutes in.

You can also read David Kaplan’s recap of my session over at PaidContent.org or another overview at Mediapost.com.

MSN Releases Traffic Numbers For LiveEarth Webcast, Sort Of

On Sunday, MSN put out a press release talking about the traffic to the Live Earth webcast. But as I mentioned in my previous post, the way the numbers are given out after webcasts, they don’t really accurately measure  the traffic.

The title of the release says "Live Earth Global Concerts Reach More Than 10 Million Online At MSN…" More than 10 million what, people? Apparently not. Because the details of the release then say "MSN had received a total of more than 10 million video streams." So it’s not 10 million people as viewers are making more than one request or visiting the site multiple times. So how many unique people was it? And why does it says MSN "received" the streams? MSN does not receive the streams, the receive the request for the stream.

They then say, "…and has the most simultaneous viewers of any online concert ever" but then the release does not give out any details on how many simultaneous streams they did. Why is it so hard for companies to keep from being so vague?

  • how many total stream requests did you full fill?
  • how many unique streams did you serve?
  • what was the average length of time someone watched the webcast?
  • what percentage of traffic came from what regions of the world?
  • what was the average bitrate that someone watched?

Very easy questions. Basic. These are the same questions that all customers ask their stream hosting provider after an event and gets exact figures.