Thanks to all the readers and many industry vendors who bought copies of my books as giveaways, my publisher Focal Press has recently sold over 20,000 copies of all the books in my series since the first one was published four years ago.

While some may think that writing books is a great way to make a lot of money, it's not. For me, the incentive was to try and get as much information on our industry out to as many people as possible and make it easy for others in the industry to get published. Many thanks to all of the authors who made the "Hands On Guide Series" possible including Steve Mack, Joe Follansbee, Lionel Felix, Damien Stolarz, Stefan Richter, Jan Ozer, and Jason Fincanon.

I've learned a lot about an industry that four years ago, I knew nothing about. If we think the online video industry is crazy, just try working in the publishing space. For me, it's also been very interesting to see how the dissemination of information has changed over the past four years. Today, writing a book about this industry seems like a waste of time since you could just blog about it in real time. Things change so fast and by the time you write a book, get it printed and published, six months has already gone by. Blogs are clearly making an impact in the publishing space replacing print and except for technical books, many business books have since being replaced by blogs about the subject. Even for me, I have no new books in the works and don't plan to as the reach, exposure and syndication I get from the blog far surpasses anything I can do in print. On a small scale, I have seen first hand the shift that has taking place from print to online.

As a thank you to everyone who has made the books a success, I'll be giving away all of my personal remaining inventory for free. Simply leave a comment in this post telling me which book you want (see the list to choose from here) and I'll pick a bunch of folks at random and mail out copies until they are gone.

The Streaming Media East conference is only a month away and we've now finalized all of our keynotes and speakers. On day two, Avner Ronen, the CEO and Founder of boxee will be one of the two keynotes in the morning. If you haven't already registered for the show, readers of my blog can register with the special discount code of DRF1 and attend both days of the show for only $695.

For full program details, visits the conference page or check out the list of speakers.

Over the past week, and in particular today, various news outlets are talking about the problems that some MLB.TV subscribers are having with MLB video. While many are quick to want to say it's an Adobe Flash problem, or an issue specifically related to HD video quality, many don't understand all the different technology pieces involved. While I do think MLB has done a poor job of telling users what exactly is going on and what they are doing for those affected, most of the problems we are reading about today, took place from when the player was still in beta just a few days ago. No one seems to be writing about this in real time.

I've been testing MLB's new Flash Video player since day one when it went into beta, fifteen days ago. In that time I have traded a dozen or so e-mails with MLB giving them my feedback, providing my system settings and judging their video quality. For the most part, I have experienced very few issues and many of the posts I have been reading on the MLB support website come from users who are dealing with the beta version of the player. When MLB made the beta version of their video player available on March 26th, the whole reason for doing so was to test their offering with real traffic, see what needed to be fixed and then roll out a new version of the player and the Next-Def plugin in time for opening day. That's exactly what happened. The day before opening day, anyone using the beta version of the player was asked to download an updated Next-Def plugin and MLB took the Flash Video player out of beta. Since that happened, the issues users are having has dropped and looking at the posts on MLB support site shows the volume has dropped dramatically over the past few days. Yes, this all happened around opening day, but that was four days ago. Most of the articles I have seen today about MLB video problems are reporting on issues from four days ago and not in real time.

In addition to having to download the Flash Video plugin to get MLB, users who want to get HD video quality also have to download what MLB calls the Next-Def plugin. This additional plugin is from Swarmcast, not Adobe, and it enables much of the new functionality you see in the MLB player like the ability to have DVR like functionality. It also enables the HD video stream to be delivered via HTTP and pulled from multiple content delivery networks, instead of the video coming from just one CDN as is the case with a non-HD video stream. While some writers are calling this an Adobe Flash plugin, it's not.

Many of the complaints on the MLB support website were around the HD video feed and around the Next-Def plugin. But since MLB has fixed the majority of user's issues from a few days ago, it's interesting to note that no new update to the Next-Def plugin has been made since opening day. So whatever issues viewers were having, it clearly was not as a result of the plugin itself. Many of the other issues I see on the MLB support website are around issues not even pertaining to video, like experiencing login issues. I also saw a bunch of angry folks on the boards complaining that when MLB launched the player in beta for the Yankees game, they could see the video but not get the audio. That's because the main audio feed from MSG was down and something MLB had no control over, which I detailed on my blog that day.

What many folks don't understand is all the different pieces that go into the MLB.TV offering. The moment there is an issue it's easy to blame the player. But what about the feed coming from the stadiums? Or the encoding? The delivery of the stream from the CDN(s)? There are a lot of moving pieces to any live event let alone so many events all taking place at once. While some may think that the main reason for MLB making the player available in beta two weeks before the season was to drive subscriptions, it wasn't. The main reason was to test the player and all of the other pieces with real traffic to see how it all works. That's not something you can test in a lab and you need real world scale to see how it works. In most cases, MLB has no ability to test the feeds from the stadiums until open day. This is live and for an offering like this, you need a day or two to make it rock solid. Especially considering that last year, MLB was not using more than one CDN and this year, with the HD offering delivered via HTTP, are using multiple CDNs.

Some of the debate seems to be around MLB using Flash this year and moving away from Silverlight, with some implying that Flash is to blame. While the Silverlight plugin automatically supports HD video without the need of an additional plugin, like Adobe needs for the MLB service, we would have seen many of the same problems if MLB was switching from Adobe to Silverlight. The plugin plays a role in the offering, but it is only one of many pieces in the entire ecosystem for live video capture, ingestion and delivery. The video plugin alone does not make or break such a service.

No one is debating that having any issues with a live video feed, especially one that you are paying for, is really frustrating. But this is not TV and should not be treated as such. It's taken MLB at most two days to solve the vast majority of the issues and we don't know how many of the issues that users are still having are as a result of the user. While I would like to see the video quality improved on the 3MB HD stream being offered by MLB, I think overall MLB's offering is really solid. And if you take the time to look at hundreds of comments on the MLB support board, many of the users are not having any problems. As of today, there are 2,742 posts on the MLB support site about HD video problems, and many of those are from duplicate users. Putting that into perspective, that not a large base of MLB.TV customers.

If you are experiencing issues with MLB.TV, please leave them in the comments section.

Within the past week, two colocation companies have contacted me to say that Cisco is acquiring colocation space in various third party data centers in the U.S. for what Cisco is calling a new Cisco based content delivery network. While Cisco has operated a CDN of their own for over ten years, it's never been an external facing offering for other companies outside of Cisco's own personal use.

With Cisco already having their own colocation facilities, purchasing data center space from multiple companies, in multiple locations certainly sounds like the start of a content delivery network. And with all the talk lately of how important video is to Cisco's plans, it sounds like Cisco's quietly building out their own CDN with a desire to compete with the major players. While the companies I have spoken with are only talking about Cisco taking colo space in the U.S. for now, even a regional based Cisco CDN offering would be interesting.

If Cisco is in fact building their own CDN, you have to wonder why they don't acquire one of the major CDN players already in the market. Cisco has the cash and has not been shy lately in saying that they want to do more acquisitions in the market. While Akamai may be too expensive for them, companies like Limelight and EdgeCast could be taken out of the market for what would be pocket change to Cisco. I also have to wonder how other CDNs in the market who buy Cisco gear for their networks would react if that vendor was then competing with them for the same delivery services they are selling.

A new CDN offering by Cicso won't be a disruptor in the market, but it would be an interesting one to watch. Cisco has the resources to be able to be build their offering for the future for when video based CDN services truly become a large business, doing over a billion dollars a year by 2011.

I'm pleased to announce that Reza Hajebi, who leads Yahoo!'s Infrastructure Strategy and Planning group and global CDN ecosystem, is confirmed as our second keynote at the Content Delivery Summit taking place next month in NYC. In addition to focusing on building out large scale networks, storage systems and data centers around the world, Reza also leads the management of Yahoo’s global CDN ecosystem which include both internal CDN resources and working with third party content delivery networks.

Reza joins Jeffrey Cohen, GM of Microsoft's Edge Computing Network as the second keynote at the summit.

I have one 15 minute demo slot open at the Streaming Media East show next month for someone tied into the online video advertising industry that can showcase some compelling video advertising campaigns. Please contact me ASAP and include details on what the campaigns are. Updated: Spot has been taken.

Tuesday May 12, 2009
2:45 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.
Demo: Compelling Video Advertising Campaigns
How can content companies and ad agencies create the most compelling video ads? What is the best way to leverage the brand awareness and interactivity that online video advertising has to offer? This sessions will focus on the creative side of online video advertising and will teach you some best-practices for creating the right content that's best suited for online viewing. Come see firsthand examples of some of the most creative and successful online video campaigns running today, hear how they were made, and learn what makes them successful.

With all the rumors lately about Disney possibly cutting a deal with Hulu, various sources at Disney are talking to many on Wall Street about Hulu's financial situation saying the company is getting low on cash. While Providence Equity Partners, who put $100M into Hulu two years ago, is saying Hulu is not having any finance problems, I tend to believe Disney. No company who is ever running low on cash says they are and their investors always tell you things are fine.

While $100M sounds like a lot of money, for a site the site of Hulu it's not unreasonable for them to have gone through the vast majority of that capital in the past 24 months. What investment NBC and FOX also put into Hulu is not known, but with Hulu's advertising revenue not yet covering their costs and their traffic skyrocketing, Hulu is clearly burning a lot of cash. Hulu served over 300M streams in February and according to comScore, attracted 34.7 million viewers in the same month. Depending on who you ask, most agree that Hulu is only filling about 50% of its ad inventory which has not been helped by the downtown of online advertising in the current economy.

If Hulu truly is ruining low on cash as Disney says, then it puts Disney in the drivers seat with their negotiations with Hulu and probably gives them some leverage they may not have had a year ago. Whether or not this was Disney's tactic from day one is not known but it will be very interesting to hear more about the deal if it happens as I'm sure many details will be leaked. While those at the Cable Show are saying not to expect a deal in the next few days, the consensus amongst many is that a deal is expected to be announced shortly.