How Vendors & PR Firms Can Get The Most Out Of Analyst Briefings

A typical analyst in the digital media sector does over a hundred vendor briefings each year, it not more. For those of us who are veterans, some companies shine as articulate and insightful, while others are relegated to our transcript archives. The former remain consistently top of mind, while the latter merely sporadically resurface as we search through our email for a keyword.

In addition to my role at StreamingMedia.com, I am also a Principal Analyst at Frost & Sullivan, working with a team of analysts in their digital media group. Along with my fellow Frost analyst Avni Rambhia, we have compiled what we think are the top-ten “what works” best for vendors and PR firms when it comes to working with industry analysts. We hope these guidelines will help companies get even more value from their relationship with Frost & Sullivan as well as other analyst firms you may work with.

Develop a relationship: This is at the top of the list, because it really is the most important but is often overlooked. Briefings and inquiries both run more smoothly and deliver better value when there’s familiarity and mutual respect. A PR firm that specializes in your industry can give you a boost on this front if you are just entering a certain market or amping up your AR/PR outreach – strength in relationship building is inevitably a feature of the best PR firms we come across. You can easily do this yourself as well. As analysts we welcome “get to know you” briefings. It’s a good way to learn about your company, and determine where in our structure of market definitions and coverage you might fit. We’re not pay-for-play and are eternally curious, so don’t be shy about reaching out. But that’s only the beginning. Meetings at trade shows, even brief ones, are a great way to put faces to names – follow up briefings become that much more engaging. At the same time, keep in mind that we come across a fair number of snake oil vendors, and we’re habitually wary of drinking any kind of kool-aid. In the case that you’re pitching a new product or making a strategic pivot, keep us in the loop on new customer wins, general-availability product releases, and pretty much anything that draws the line from concept to concrete at your end.

Avoid Death by Powerpoint: Unless you’re testing a new marketing message on us, using an excruciatingly detailed set of slides to deliver a monologue ranks among the least effective ways to conduct a briefing. Interactive discussions that demonstrate your expertise, credibility and competitive differentiation result in more favorable and more long-lasting impressions for us. They are also likely to result in refreshingly informative briefing experiences for you. Periodically interjecting questions like “do you agree with our assumption that…”, or “how do you think this relates to …..” are good ways to trigger interactive discussions and pivot the conversation if necessary. We love to hear about customer wins, in the context of why you were selected and how you delivered value. In all cases, try to send slides via email, since Webex or Skype don’t always work as expected. If you’ll be demonstrating a product interactively, make sure you (or your PR firm) inform us ahead of time so we can plan to stay wi-fi connected for the duration of the call.

Be Available: Research studies tend to be developed on tight schedules, so responding in timely fashion to briefing requests is deeply appreciated. Similarly, responding in timely fashion (as best as you are able) to preliminary market estimates helps ensure that you are represented as accurately as possible in published research. This doesn’t have to be burdensome – a short 15-minute call is often plenty to get the information we need. Going back to relationship building – we’re quite self-aware when pushing the scheduling envelope on occasion. For vendors who make the effort to accommodate us, we’re inevitably glad to return the favor as the need may arise.

Book trade show meetings early: For any analyst on your must-meet list, please reach out early to book a slot. Trade show calendars fill up very quickly. It’s not uncommon for us to get a slew of requests two weeks before the show, and have companies be displeased because there’s no more room to add meetings. This is especially true if you are an up-and-coming company seeking to build visibility and influence. For PR firms, it’s easiest for us when you send all your requests as one block – early enough that the calendar is pretty open. That maximizes your ability to have us meet your large and small accounts, while minimizing the individual scheduling requests that we juggle.

Livestream as many sessions/talks as you can: Not every analyst who touches your market is able to travel to physical events. Even if these presentations or panel discussions are at trade shows, we’re frequently multiple-booked and can’t attend or can’t stay the duration. Broadcasting the event via live stream, or (better) having it available to stream on demand, significantly increases our chances of viewing the material you worked so hard to put together. Having the videos in archive for us to be able to view later (i.e. when we’re actively updating a relevant market study) is invaluable.

On Engaging Via Social Media: Although we regularly monitor social media, standing out on our radar is hard. This is especially true if you’re a smaller company that we don’t already have a relationship with. Tagging a specific analyst in a tweet is a good way to be noticed. That said, tagging analysts in unsolicited online conversations is both awkward and unproductive. A short email with links to a breaking story and a concise summary of implications is extremely useful. While many analysts at other firms can be hard to reach, all Frost analysts have their email listed on Frost.com and I publish my cell phone number on everything. I’d gladly take a call over an email any day of the week and a lot more gets accomplished on the phone.

It’s not just about the PR: Analysts are reliable resources to test assumptions, validate product roadmaps, and refine prospect lists. Especially if you are a subscriber – but even if you’re not – have your product managers talk to the analysts, or at least listen in on briefing calls. We talk to customers, suppliers and competitors, and can offer a comprehensive and unvarnished view of your market. That said, it’s a two-way street. While we most often talk to the outbound marketing teams, we love talking to product managers. Those conversations tend to be more “real”, less fluffy, and give us far more insight into your competencies and market position. This directly translates into more accurate positioning within our studies. It also improves our level of confidence in recommending you to potential customers and in some cases investors.

Be an active consumer of research: One of our key responsibilities is to give you the data you need, in a format that is useful to you. No two companies are alike in how they view and measure the world. Don’t be shy about asking questions about any research you subscribe to. Frost & Sullivan typically publishes a small fraction of all the data and insight we have – it’s essentially the tip of an iceberg. Any competent analyst will be more than happy to get on the phone to answer questions, and provide follow-up material as needed. These requests also serve as customer research for our own studies. If we know that a long-standing customer prefers to see market numbers sliced in a certain way, we’re more likely to include that type of analysis in the study itself or proactively send it over to you when a study is being updated. Data is increasingly commoditized; implications and guidance on the “so-what” takeaways are what enable you to translate data into information, and information into growth strategies.

Keep It Real: As analysts, we tend to know our markets inside-out. We are well aware of trends, undercurrents, challenges and the current state of buzzword bingo. While we are resigned to the fate of being frequent recipients of glossy marketing pitches and inflated performance numbers, our job is to uncover what’s real. Candid conversations on your strengths, weaknesses, roadmap and growth plans help build trust and engage our interest. Conversely, sugar-coated briefings can result in long-term persistence of listening with a pinch of salt. Most analysts will be responsible about keeping all conversations confidential – our reputations are among our strongest assets. We’re happy to share our candid opinions in return. We are often pulled into calls to share and discuss insights that run against the grain of the internal team – these open discussions deliver real value, and real savings, to our customers. They are enabled by liaisons and stakeholders who are willing to keep it real.

It’s also important to remember that there are hundreds if not thousands of vendors across the entire digital media landscape. No analyst can be expected to reach out to each one. Many times vendors will suggest they should be on our radar and yet they don’t initiate briefings, sends us news, or put us in touch with their customers. The burden is on the vendor to be proactive in getting on our radar and staying there. Unfortunately at the same time, many analysts don’t make themselves easy to reach, ignore emails, and rarely publish their phone number, or will only talk to you if you pay them money. This is a terrible model and I recently did a blog post on this entitled “Many Industry Analysts Need To Rethink Their Role, Should Not Be Pay-To-Play“.

A good analyst doesn’t just want a one-off briefing, they want to get to know the company over an extended period of time and also hear their take on the industry. Don’t work with anyone you need to pay just to be able to give them a briefing, or have to subscribe to their research, just to have a conversation. If they require that, simply say no and move on no matter how big the analyst firm may be. If that’s the way they operate, then most won’t respect their thoughts on the market anyway. Any analyst that complains they are too busy to speak to you and can only talk to those who pay, doesn’t understand what the role of an industry analyst is and you can find and work with ones that are more than happy to hear about your company’s experience in the market.

Sponsored by

An Inside Look At How PacketZoom Is Accelerating Performance In China’s 1.3B Mobile User Market

In the summer of 2016, Shlomi Gian made the decision to leave the comfort of corporate America giant Akamai and join 3-year old startup PacketZoom as their CEO. Shlomi was not sure how “David” could compete with the industry “Goliaths” in selling this new in-app networking solution that challenged the fundamental axioms the performance market has been trained to follow for years. After all, everyone knows that the world has gone mobile but too many of us have accepted the fact that the mobile experience will always lag far behind the desktop experience. Many people believed that not much could be done to address the problem since the industry was widely adopting old web solutions in the failed attempt to resolve the mobile challenge.

A few weeks after joining PacketZoom, Shlomi and the team realized there’s a smarter way to way to settle this dispute: “David” can utilize his innovative edge to enhance “Goliaths” power so everyone wins. Luckily, PacketZoom’s Mobile Expresslane was designed to be CDN agnostic, and there was no direct integration between the two. That helped address an important market decision the company made in the early days deciding that PacketZoom’s solution will enhance CDNs and not replace them. The idea of joining forces with the big guys was seeded and the obvious partners became the dozen web CDN vendors. Many of them had already started expressing frustration with the limitation of traditional CDN services in a mobile-first world and had been searching for smart, breakthrough technologies to resolve the mobile performance challenge. The market was ready to take the leap and start providing mobile app devops with a one stop shop for their mobile app performance needs.

Much had been said about the Chinese market and the speed in which the country is developing. With 430 million devices shipped last year, the Chinese mobile is the biggest smartphone market on the planet, and with $5.5B in game revenue, the Chinese mobile gaming industry is surely one to watch. The less discussed topic is the state of the Chinese mobile networks. While LTE is being deployed everywhere, it seems like the size and population density is challenging  even the latest telecommunication technology. Based on PacketZoom Mobile Observatory, China suffers from 9.2% transfer failure rate (similar to Malaysia, India and Brazil), and a high packet loss.  These two parameters have severe impact on content download time and overall performance.

Late last year, an initial and infrequent conversation between PacketZoom and ChinaCache started to formalize. The idea of partnering with China’s leading CDN, and leveraging its size and expertise to penetrate the Chinese market made perfect sense. PacketZoom, a hungry, fast-growing start-up with a vision to “offer technology that sets the standard for mobile app performance worldwide, simply and reliably“, could change the standard of mobile performance in China. Initial testing indicated that PacketZoom’s Mobile Expresslane, running in ChinaCache data centers in mainland reduced latency by 3x on average, which meant a significant improvement in both static content download, as well as API access time and failure rate. The combined solution worked flawlessly and was ready to sell into the market.

Earlier this month ChinaCache and PacketZoom completed their contract and PacketZoom’s Mobile Expresslane will now be operated and sold exclusively in the Chinese market by ChinaCache. This will be the first time that I know of that mobile content delivery is optimized in all three miles in a production environment and based on early results the companies are seeing, expectations are pretty high.

Updating Enterprise Video Platforms Study: Looking To Speak To Vendors

Frost & Sullivan is currently working on an update to our Enterprise Video Platforms study and is looking to speak to vendors focused on the space. The report will focus on the use of video solutions for enterprise communications and will examine key market drivers and restraints, identify business and technology trends, and publish global market revenues. We are currently in the process of doing briefings with vendors in this market. If you play in this space, please reach out to Frost & Sullivan Industry Analyst, Anisha Vinny to schedule a call.

NYC Streaming Meetup Tuesday Night, 6pm

554821_327218634021249_880501208_nThe next streaming media meetup in NYC will take place on Tuesday, February 28th, starting at 6pm at Tavern 29, located at on 29th street and Park. We will be on the second floor and they do ask for ID at the door. There is no RSVP list, just show up, bring a friend and spread the word! We will have open bar thanks to sponsors Level 3, Haivision and Cedexis. 🍺 🍸🍷

I’ll keep organizing these every month so if you want to be notified via email when the next one is taking place, send me an email and I’ll add you to the list.

Telstra Owned Ooyala Lays Off 14%, Will Re-Invest and Rehire Outside Of OVP Business Line

ooyalaTelstra owned online video platform provider Ooyala, laid off 14% of their workforce, or about 70 employees on Tuesday. This news comes from a memo that was shared with me that was sent to all Ooyala employees announcing the changes. While having to let people go is never good, in this case Ooyala is using the layoffs to re-focus their business. The company plans to re-hire about 7% new employees and will re-invest in their sales and operations groups, specifically for products outside of their OVP product line.

Since Ooyala was acquired by Telstra, the company has invested significantly in R&D for their online video product and will continue to be in that market. Ooyala is not exiting or shifting away from their core OVP business, but rather right-sizing their investment to ensure an equal level of resourcing across all three of their business lines. A big part of the company’s focus is now on selling an integrated suite of products that deliver personalized cloud TV, specifically their Ooyala Flex and Ooyala Pulse products. As a result, the company said in the internal letter that they, “had to reduce the number of jobs in our core OVP R&D organization to open jobs that will fuel growth in our new lines of business.”

Ooyala definitely got a bit too big when it came to the number of employees they had working on their OVP product line and re-focusing the business is a smart move on their part. The online video platform market is not as big as some think which Ooyala’s acknowledges in their memo saying the market is “becoming more commoditized by the number of competitors and large enterprises entering the business“. So making sure their workforce and investments are equal across all of their services, and realigning their workforce around that is a necessary step.

The company has never discussed revenue numbers but in a call I had last year with a Telstra executive, Ooyala was on a run-rate to do $100M in revenue by 2018, which would be about half the size of publicly traded OVP Brightcove.

Any Ooyala employees now looking for a job are welcome to send me their resume, as I often get asked by vendors looking to hire who’s available in the market.

Data Shows Traditional CDNs Are Losing Competitive Edge in US Mobile App Arena

PacketZoom recently analyzed the top 100 websites and compared it with the top 100 mobile apps to see which CDN solutions are dominating the competitive landscape and to determine how much variation there is in CDN market share between web and mobile apps. The data shows that Akamai is leading the market with 35.3% market share (no surprise) with vendors such as Fastly, Verizon and Amazon following a 3:1 ratio. In addition multiple smaller players indicate it’s already a mature and saturated market.

screen-shot-2017-02-13-at-11-28-08-pmPacketZoom also analyzed the top 100 mobile apps, including names like Netflix, Uber and Snapchat and broke down the findings by CDN market share, looking for the dominant players. This time around the results show that Amazon is leading with a 40% market share, most likely due to its strong developer relationships. Since Amazon’s content delivery service CloudFront integrates with other Amazon Web Services offerings, it offers developers an easy way to distribute content to end users, hence putting Amazon on top. Akamai and Verizon follow with 14% and 11% market share respectively, along with fewer smaller players which indicates an evolving market.

screen-shot-2017-02-13-at-11-35-45-pmThe key takeaway from this data is that the mobile app market is a new world that’s very different from the commoditized CDN market and one that is growing faster than anyone had predicted. Mobile apps require delivery solutions that have been designed with a mobile-first world in mind, something many CDNs still struggle to do.

PacketZoom shows optimal results with Amazon CloudFront since both solutions are running in the same data centers, which saves the need for an extra network hop to the CDN edge server. Multiple mobile app developers that are already enjoying the ease of use of Amazon CloudFront have told me that coupling it with PacketZoom’s Mobile Expresslane is the easiest and most powerful way to maximize mobile app performance. What’s interesting about new solutions coming to the CDN market is that they aren’t trying to displace the traditional CDNs, but rather make them better. PacketZoom’s in-app technology is uniquely positioned as a CDN enhancer and not a CDN replacement. By removing roadblocks in the mobile last mile, PacketZoom says they are able to significantly accelerate performance by 2x to 3x, rescue up to 80% of sessions from TCP connection drop and reduce CDN costs.

Latest List Of CDN Vendors Selling To Broadcasters, Carriers and MSOs

[Updated: You can find an updated list from January, 2013 at this link.] There have been a lot of changes in the CDN vendor landscape over the past few months, so here’s an updated list of all the vendors I am tracking. They are broken out by vendors that offer commercial CDN services to content owners, and vendors that offer CDN platforms for MSO and carriers. (You can easily find this list at anytime by going to www.cdnlist.com)

The term CDN means many things to different people and is an umbrella term that covers a lot of different types of content delivery services. Video streaming, software downloads, web and mobile content acceleration, licensed/managed CDN, transparent caching, and services to measure CDN performance, load balancing, multi-CDN switching and analytics and cloud intelligence. It’s a complex ecosystem with a lot of vendors both large and small. You also have some CDNs that cross over into other industries like security and WAN optimization, two segments that for the most part, are not included in my list.

Just because two vendors are on the same list together, it does not mean they should be compared to each other at a company level. You have to compare the services they offer apples-to-apples. Some are more regional than others, some are targeting certain sized customers and some only focus on certain types of content delivery.

Commercial CDNs (sell to content owners and publishers)

CDN Platforms For Carriers (sell to MSOs, ISP, and network operators things like traffic management, transparent caching, licensed CDN, DIY CDN etc.)

Analytics and QoS Platforms

Telco/Carrier Based CDN Deployments
We hear a lot about telcos and carriers in the CDN market, but the vast majority of them have built out CDNs for their own internal use and are not selling it as a commercial CDN service. There are a few exceptions like Level 3, Verizon, Comcast and Tata who offer commercial CDN services and compete against other commercial CDNs, but most telco and carrier based commercial CDN services are based off of reselling a traditional CDN, for example AT&T reselling Akamai. This telco/carrier list is far from being complete and needs to be updated.

CDN Related Vendor Acquisitions/Closures
In addition to the current crop of vendors in the market, I think it’s important to remember how the CDN industry got to where it is today. Many CDNs raised tons of money but didn’t have a business model, some only focused on selling at the lowest price and many had technology that simply didn’t work. Lots of CDNs went under, some within a short time of launching. The CDN market has been through a lot of hard times over the past 20 years and here’s a running list of those who got acquired or went under.

Each time I make a list of vendors, for any solution or service in the market, I always get emails from companies asking why they are not on the list. If you think you should be added to the list, please add it to the comments section but note that I am not listing regional hosting providers or companies who get most of their sales from $100 a month customers. Also, just because you are not on this list doesn’t mean you don’t have a valid solution in the market, but the companies listed are the ones I get asked about most often, get mentioned in the media, are included in major RFPs and promote and market their services to medium and large customers.